The decision by our most prominent Church leaders to write an open letter protesting at the growing numbers of people needing food is a long overdue debate. The growth of food banks has been well documented in recent times as many of us have continued to feel the after effects of the recession.
All recessions result in misery and it is sadly the poorest in society who inevitably fare the worst as jobs become more scarce. The debate this morning on the Today programme concentrated on how to solve this problem. While I applaud that approach, I would also urge people to engage in seeking the cause. If the cause is removed, the problem will be addressed more effectively.
As I write, we live in a purportedly civilised society. Food waste has never been so high. In equal measure, the general public and the all conquering supermarkets must both shoulder their share of the blame. I would struggle to think of a more immoral scenario than this one. On the one hand, we have increasing numbers of people going hungry (this is 2014) and increasing levels of food being thrown away. Yes, we have food banks and for some they have literally become a lifeline. As the welfare budget has been cut, those dependent upon it have become ever more squeezed.
Did the new Government in 2010 have the choice to maintain the welfare budget? Sadly, I don't think they did. They have introduced a new system which encourages people to work if they are able to do so but this is not a new system. This is the very system upon which Beveridge built the Welfare State after the war. One of the problems has been the way in which successive Governments have allowed the budget to rise. In so doing, they have perpetuated a culture of dependency upon it. The Welfare State was never designed for such an outcome. I have genuine sympathy for the disabled, carers and those genuinely unable to work. These are the very people for whom the Welfare State was designed. I was a carer for my first wife for over two years and received the princely sum of £11 per week for the privilege. It's not that I wasn't grateful for that money because I most certainly was. It's just that it was patently insufficient and in no way recognised the true worth of the millions of carers who continue to work for their loved ones every day. The money they save the NHS is incalculable.
When a new Government comes to power, it is faced with assessing the state of the nation's finances before it can start making promises about spending money and this Coalition was no different. We can argue about the speed of the cuts but we can't argue about the need to make them. Our country was in a financial mess and they have had the thankless task of addressing that. I do not profess political allegiance to the Coalition but I do recognise that they had to take the decision they took. Whether the deficit was caused by the outgoing Labour party or the Global recession or a combination of the two is frankly irrelevant now.
But the real question remains; why are people going hungry? In truth there are many reasons for this. I find it interesting that religious leaders have entered the fray at a time when religion has seldom seemed less relevant. They deserve great credit for initiating the debate. In the days when our churches were well attended, a man would not stand by and witness his fellow man suffer the indignity of hunger. I certainly wouldn't. The demise of our community spirit has contributed largely to this and has been brought about by a succession of ill advised policies.
I listened to the CEO of British Gas (Centrica ) this morning defending the prices being charged by his company. It is reported that 3% have left in the last year with many more expected to follow. That is one glimmer of good news in that the competition within the energy market is beginning to warm up. If we still had our coal industry, this problem need not be as bad as it is. Still, we are where we are so we must look forwards and not back. Looking forwards, we need to invest in strategies which will reduce the cruel levels of fuel poverty. Having to choose between heating or eating is a tough choice. It is all the more so when you are an elderly person living alone. Again, if our community was functioning as it once did (and as it still should), we would not stand by and tolerate such an outcome.
I have recently highlighted the need to support our local high streets. The main reason why I support this so passionately is that this constitutes the community hub. The church, the pub, the cafe, the grocer, the butcher, the cobbler. The list goes on but these services should be at the centre of our lives - not on the periphery. The supermarkets should be on the periphery but a succession of Governments both national and local have welcomed them with open arms. Had they stopped for one minute to consider the consequences, they might not have been so quick to do so. The effect on local jobs has been catastrophic but the effects on local community has been devastating. A vibrant high street correlates with a vibrant community spirit and if you don't believe me go to towns like Barnsley (overtly Labour), Ludlow (overtly Tory) and others. They demonstrate that you can have a healthy high street in spite of one of the supermarkets. Politics has little to do with it. This is all about people making community choices when they spend their money - if they want to live within a strong community. It is the role of our independent high street shops to be community orientated and distance themselves from the cynical marketing ploys of the share holder driven supermarkets. We pay our money and we take our choice...
I listened yesterday to an interesting programme exploring the recent trend which has seen the big four supermarkets see their takings stagnate while the discounters such as LIDL and Aldi have prospered. An expert was charged with buying the same basket of shopping fro LIDL and Tesco. They were not buying foie gras - just basic food such as bread, milk, eggs, vegetables, fruit, cereal etc. The basket from LIDL costed £17. The equivalent basket from Tesco costed £27. Even with a clubcard, that is an almighty difference for the many millions living on or near the bread line.
But how far have we sunk when supermarkets are throwing food in to skips at the rear of their premises and seeking to prosecute those trying to rescue some of that food for their consumption. How much food are we all throwing away and why are we doing that? What do food banks represent to us? Do we see them as solutions for the needy or do we see them as an indictment of our civilised society?
No comments:
Post a Comment